Editorial: Squeezing the Tap

It begins with a drip.

A treaty suspended. A river slowed. A digital melee turning into real physical threats. For two neighbours who have waged three wars against each other, India and Pakistan are finding fresh ways to renew old rivalries.

In April, following an attack by pro-Pakistan militants in Kashmir, India halted the Indus Waters Treaty—a pact that had been upheld since 1960. For Pakistan, downstream from the Indus and therefore deeply interested in what happens upstream, it was more than a diplomatic slap. It was a logistic squeeze.

The Indus sustains over 300 million people. Roughly 80% of Pakistan’s agriculture depends on it. Under the treaty, India was required  to keep the water flowing. Until now.

Climate change and population growth are burdening the system. At the same time that demand for fresh water is rising, the very glaciers that feed the Indus are shrinking. The World Economic Forum now ranks water scarcity, alongside climate change and pandemics, as a global security risk.

India’s move was calibrated. Officially, it responded to a terrorist attack. Unofficially, it reminded Islamabad—and the world—that in the subcontinent, while rivers flow downhill, the real power lies upstream.

Rising pressures

India, however, is also facing a squeeze of its own—from the cloud.

Its $224bn IT export engine, long fuelled by armies of coders, faces a reckoning as generative AI automates tasks once outsourced to Bangalore. According to EY India, 38 million jobs could be affected by 2030. Multinationals are responding by shifting from execution to innovation, turning their Indian outposts into R&D labs.

Yet challenges remain. India produces 2.7 million STEM graduates a year, but fewer than 4% pursue doctorates. Top talent often leaves the country. And while the US boasts 120 of the world’s top 500 supercomputers, India has just three.

India is moving fast, but not fast enough. It has begun the transition to high-end tech, but still trails global leaders in infrastructure and advanced research. Its momentum is real—but so are the obstacles.

Across the border, Pakistan’s problems are more familiar. Debt has reached 94% of GDP. The IMF remains a revolving door of debt. The much-hyped Uraan Pakistan plan promises a digital leap and 6% growth by 2028. But with low monetary reserves, rising inflation, and high youth unemployment, it may have set its sights too high.

Chinese infrastructure—via the $50bn China-Pakistan Economic Corridor—has built roads and power plants, but has also bred dependency. Militants, particularly the Balochistan Liberation Army, have repeatedly targeted CPEC projects in protest against what they view as foreign exploitation. Debt repayments loom. Sovereignty is mortgaged.

Pakistan’s military budget remains high. Kashmir—where Pakistan supports separatist militants and India maintains a heavy security presence—continues to stir nationalist passions to justify defence spending on both sides. As social services start to buckle and economic strain deepens, the pressure builds.

The squeeze that is being felt is not just economic or environmental. It’s emotional.

Nearly a billion Indians and Pakistanis are online, many of them young and angry. After the April terrorist attack, AI-generated footage and recycled propaganda swept through feeds, as each side accused the other of myriad lies and crimes.

In this tinderbox, misinformation moves too fast for diplomacy to catch up.
One fake video can plunge a whole nation into rage. In democracies, where public sentiment drives much of policy, this is more than just noise. It represents real danger.

A Global Battleground

Meanwhile, the great powers are watching—and making moves of their own.

India is deepening its ties with the US, and so is Japan with Australia via the Quad, combining their navies and pooling their digital resources. Pakistan relies more and more on China. Ports, pipelines, and patrol routes are no longer neutral assets—it’s how China makes its influence felt.

The subcontinent, once treated as a pit of long-held grudges, is now a prize in a global contest. 

Three different paths are open to India and Pakistan. One is reconciliation—unlikely but possible—with renewed cooperation on water, trade, and tech. Another is rupture—through war, sabotage, or environmental pressures creating instability. The third, and most probable, is a grinding standoff, as two overstretched nations channel their populations’ anger into hatred towards their neighbour.

If water once held the promise of cooperation for mutual benefit, it is now the latest weapon. Other areas which previously held the potential of cooperation may follow in a domino effect. 

South Asia’s older tragedies unfolded with soldiers staring into the gun barrels of their enemy. The new one does so through megawatts, data packets, and the flow of rivers. When pressure builds and there is no release, eventually comes the breaking point.

Statement

Things are heating up in South Asia. After an attack by militants in Kashmir, India suspended the Indus Waters Treaty, limiting the flow of water to Pakistan. As climate stress is added to digital disruption, both nations face domestic pressures. AI threatens India’s IT sector; debt shackles Pakistan’s development. Online outrage is worsening  tensions. Misinformation gathers steam as rivers are turned into weapons. As global powers secure their interests via tech and trade alliances, regional frictions risk taking on an international aspect. The tools which competitors employ may be changing—but their underlying rivalries remain unresolved.